Women’s National League Clubs Unite Against Proposed Academy Team Expansion

Jun 11, 2026 3 min read John K
Women’s National League Clubs Unite Against Proposed Academy Team Expansion

More than 50 clubs from the Women’s National League (WNL) have formally challenged plans that would allow academy sides from top-flight clubs to enter the league structure, escalating a growing dispute over the future direction of the women’s game in England.

A total of 52 clubs have signed a letter to the Football Association opposing proposals that would see four Women’s Super League academy teams introduced into the third tier of the women’s pyramid from 2027. The clubs have also requested a special general meeting with the FA to discuss the matter.

The signatories have formed what they describe as an alliance, arguing that the planned changes have been pushed forward without adequate consultation. They claim representatives on the league board failed to properly engage member clubs and describe the proposals as both unfair and damaging to existing teams.

The Women’s National League currently consists of 72 clubs, meaning the 52 signatories comfortably exceed the two-thirds threshold required to call for a special meeting. However, none of the clubs represented by elected FAWNL board members have backed the request.

In their letter, the clubs outlined several concerns they want addressed. These include questions over whether the board’s process complies with the constitutional rights of member clubs, criticism of the use of anonymous surveys rather than a formal vote, concerns about financial incentives being used to secure support, and calls for greater transparency and accountability in decision-making.

The clubs are also seeking clarification on the independence of board decisions and the overall governance process behind the proposed reforms.

Among the teams backing the challenge are Hashtag United, Middlesbrough, Derby County, Halifax, Doncaster Belles and Hull City.

Former Women’s National League chair Carol West has also spoken out against the plans. She argued that most clubs do not want Professional Game Academy teams competing in the league and criticised the lack of a formal vote on the issue. West warned that the impact of the changes should not be underestimated and questioned why clubs had not been given the opportunity to decide the matter democratically.

Supporters of the proposal argue that academy teams could help bridge the development gap between youth football and the professional game. Earlier this year, Chelsea manager Sonia Bompastor said young players would benefit from competing against senior opposition and called for a competition structure that better supports player development.

There are currently 22 academies across the Women’s Super League and WSL 2, with only West Ham and Charlton Athletic lacking a category-one academy, the highest standard available.

The proposed academy expansion forms part of wider discussions between WSL Football and the FA about the future structure of the women’s game. Key objectives include improving player development pathways, creating stronger links between grassroots and elite football, providing personalised support for players, encouraging sustainable club growth and raising professional standards across all levels.

For now, the existing dual-registration system will remain in place, allowing academy players to represent both their parent WSL club and teams in the Women’s National League. However, the growing opposition from clubs suggests the debate over academy participation is far from settled.